Microsoft Access Modernization
Modernize Microsoft Access databases and applications without losing the business rules, workflows, and data your organization depends on.
Services
Paradox applications built in the 1990s still run inventory, billing, membership, and case-management work for many organizations. Every one of them depends on a 32-bit database engine that has not been actively developed in more than twenty years. DataPhoenixAI documents what your Paradox system actually does, moves its data into SQL Server or Azure SQL, and rebuilds the application on a platform your team can support.
Most Paradox problems trace back to the Borland Database Engine (BDE), the data-access layer every Paradox application relies on. It predates modern Windows security, networking, and 64-bit computing.
A Paradox application is more than its tables. Before planning the migration, we catalog every file the system uses and trace how the pieces depend on each other.
Paradox data carries format details that a straight export can silently damage. We build repeatable extraction scripts and reconcile the results against the source instead of relying on a one-time conversion.
The data typically moves to SQL Server or Azure SQL Database. The application layer depends on how your team works: a web application suits distributed users and remote access, while a .NET desktop application can suit heavy data-entry work that benefits from a familiar Windows interface. Reports are rebuilt in a modern reporting tool, and ObjectPAL business rules move into documented, testable code or database constraints.
Paradox systems usually cannot be switched off for weeks. We plan a staged transition: the new database is loaded and reconciled from Paradox extracts, users validate key workflows against real data, and the final cutover follows a last incremental load. The Paradox tables are then kept read-only for reference.
Yes. The Paradox application stays in production during discovery, design, and development. Data is extracted from copies of the tables, so migration work does not interfere with daily use.
Paradox can connect to SQL Server through BDE connectivity drivers, but the application still depends on the BDE and on ObjectPAL. That can serve as a short-term bridge, but it does not remove the underlying risk, so we treat it as an interim step at most.
Every report in use is inventoried with its purpose and audience. Reports that are still needed are rebuilt against the new database and compared side by side with the Paradox output before sign-off. Reports nobody uses are retired rather than rebuilt.
Not if the table passwords are available. Protected tables are opened with their passwords during extraction, and access control moves to the security model of the new database.
It depends on the number of tables, forms, and reports, how much ObjectPAL logic exists, and how many integrations are involved. A system audit produces an inventory and a scoped plan, so the timeline is based on your actual application rather than a guess.
Modernize Microsoft Access databases and applications without losing the business rules, workflows, and data your organization depends on.
Migrate Microsoft Access data to SQL Server while addressing schema design, queries, relationships, application dependencies, and business rules.
Modernize Visual Basic 6 applications by documenting legacy behavior, identifying dependencies, and moving business-critical workflows to maintainable technology.
Choose the right path for an aging database application — upsize, rebuild, replace, or retire — and migrate its data and business rules to a supported platform.
Modernize FoxPro applications and databases by documenting legacy behavior, assessing data dependencies, and planning a maintainable replacement.